Click on the link called Obedience in Retrospect from the list on the right of the page under social influence. Read the article by Alan Elms on obedience. Post a comment giving your opinions on the research and the article linked to this. This needs to be more than just a sentence. Any problems post a comment or see Miss Duffin
September 22, 2006
September 21, 2006
Year 12 Homework Research Methods Due 26th September
Complete Quiz “Aims and Hypotheses” on the right hand side of page 22 in your workbook. Any problems post a comment!
September 11, 2006
Year 13 Phobias Extension Task
Find out about Phobias! What type of phobias are there? What causes them and how are they treated? Write a fact about them that you have found out in your research as a comment linked to this post and then a 300 word summary to share in class. have fun!
September 7, 2006
References in Coursework (Year 13)
Just a quick note to say these must be alphabetical and in the standard format. Look in the back of your coursework pack or any psychology book for examples. You must have a reference for each and every piece of research you talk about in the introduction and/or the discussion
September 6, 2006
Year 12 Induction Homework
Follow the links about Bandura in the induction section of the blog. Find out one key thing about Bandura – it could be about his research, the implications of this, his life or anything else that interests you. Post your finding linked to this entry before your next lesson!
Year 13 Discussion Help!
F1 Explanation of findings
Relate to the aim/hypotheses without referring to the statistics. So explain whether the aim has been supported or not, whether the hypotheses have been retained or rejected and state these in full. Now consider the statistics. Explain whether the results were as expected and why this was so OR state any findings you did not anticipate. Explain any additional findings that may have been noted in the gathering of the data with reference to the original aim.
F2 Background theory
The results must be related back to the background theory. Do the results support or contradict? If they support are there any further explanations/new theories that can be cited to explain further the results (do not repeat research already given in the introduction)? If they contradict, consider why. Give criticisms of the background theory that might explain the contradiction, and include any alternative explanations that challenge the background research.
F3 Limitations and modifications
All research has methodological weaknesses, e.g. sample-bias, disadvantages of the research method (design if appropriate), researcher and participant effects, confounding variables, reliability and validity, quantitative/qualitative approach, measurement scales, lack of standardisation or pilot test, statistical treatments, type errors, ethics. If the study is correlational you must remember lack of causation as the key limitation. Do not forget the modifications, i.e. suggest how these weaknesses could be addressed.
F4 Implications and suggestions for further research
Discuss the wider implications of the findings e.g. do the findings have social significance? Real-life validity? Applications? Or are there any ethical implications? For example, if your results support a correlation between stress and physical illness, the implication would be the negative effects of stress and how these could be best reduced. Give ideas for follow up research; these should be a logical outcome of your research investigation, i.e. something that expands upon it by changing a key variable. For example, a further research based on stress and physical illness could be a correlational investigation into stress and psychological illness. Only a couple of ideas are needed but do elaborate. That is, explain what this would involve, e.g. the research method etc. and refer to background research that supports the relevance of the suggestions. Do not just do one or the other—you must include implications AND suggestions.